Research at a Glance: National Justice Survey 2017 - Sentencing Commissions and Guidelines

Most Canadians feel that sentencing guidelines are the best way to ensure a fair sentence and they believe that sentencing would be more consistent with such guidelines. Many Canadians also believe that Canada should consider having a sentencing commission, and that most important activity of this body would be to give judges guidelines for sentencing decisions.

What we also found:

Seven in ten (71%) Canadians indicated that the best approach to sentencing is to provide guidelines while sill allowing for a judge's discretion.

More than eight in ten (83%) thought that guidelines for sentencing would help making sentencing more consistent (only 4% did not believe that this would be the case) and that Canada should consider having set guidelines (81%).

Données et ressources

Info additionnelle

Champ Valeur
Dernière modification avril 17, 2026, 20:16 (TU)
Créé le avril 17, 2026, 20:16 (TU)
contact_email OG-GO@justice.gc.ca
criticality_level []
geographic_scope []
open_canada_collection publication
open_canada_date_published 2018-03-05 00:00:00
open_canada_keywords {"fr": ["Système judiciaire", "Recherche", "Consultation", "Questions juridiques", "Juges", "Système de justice pénale", "condamnation"], "en": ["Justice system", "Research", "Consultations", "Legal issues", "Judges", "Criminal justice system", "Convictions"]}
open_canada_subject ["law", "persons", "processes", "society_and_culture"]
sensitivity_level unrestricted
title_fr Recherche en un coup d’oeil : Sondage national sur la justice de 2017 - Commissions et lignes directrices sur la détermination de la peine
update_frequency as_needed